Thunbnail image
News   >  Endocrinology   >  

Debate Over New Weekly Insulin: Safety Concerns Take Center Stage

Published: 5/26/2024
      
weekly insulin
type 1 diabetes
hypoglycemia risk
insulin icodec
Novo Nordisk
FDA advisory committee
ONWARDS 6 trial
HbA1c reduction
glucose monitoring
diabetes management

Key Takeaways

  • FDA committee votes against approving once-weekly insulin for type 1 diabetes due to hypoglycemia risks.
  • The ONWARDS 6 trial findings raised significant safety concerns.
  • Further trials needed to identify safe subpopulations for use.

Did You Know?

Did you know that hypoglycemia, or low blood sugar, can cause symptoms like confusion, seizures, and even loss of consciousness?

Introduction to Once-Weekly Insulin

Recently, there has been significant interest in an investigational insulin product that requires only once-weekly dosing. This product, developed by Novo Nordisk, is called insulin icodec. While once-weekly dosing could potentially offer convenience and improved adherence for diabetes management, safety concerns have become a major topic of discussion.

FDA Advisory Committee's Decision

An FDA advisory committee convened to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new insulin product for adults with type 1 diabetes. After thorough discussion and review, the committee voted 7-4 against recommending approval. The primary concern raised was the risk of hypoglycemia, a condition characterized by dangerously low blood sugar levels.

Dr. Jill Crandall, a committee member, noted, “The risks are very clear, and the benefits are not.” This sentiment was echoed by several other members who also cited a lack of demonstrated benefits compared to existing treatments.

Clinical Trial Insights

The decision was influenced largely by results from the ONWARDS 6 trial. This Phase III study compared once-weekly icodec against once-daily degludec. While icodec was shown to be non-inferior in terms of HbA1c reduction, it had a higher rate of significant or severe hypoglycemia during the trial period. There were 19.9 events of hypoglycemia per patient-year with icodec compared to 10.4 with degludec, necessitating a careful consideration of these risks.

Mitigation Strategies and Challenges

To counteract the hypoglycemia risks, Novo Nordisk suggested several mitigation strategies. These included using insulin icodec only with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), restricting its use to patients with stable glycemic control, and additional restrictions to limit its use to suitable candidates. However, many committee members found these suggestions insufficient and called for more rigorous safeguards.

Dr. Paul Beringer criticized these strategies as “untested and potentially difficult to implement” in real-world settings, indicating that further refinements might be necessary before reconsidering approval.

Potential Benefits Amid Concerns

Despite the concerns, some members of the committee acknowledged that certain subpopulations might benefit from a once-weekly insulin option. These might include patients who have fears of needles or those struggling with daily adherence to insulin therapy. But identifying and testing the product specifically on these populations would be crucial.

Next Steps and Future Trials

The committee emphasized that Novo Nordisk should conduct further clinical trials to better identify which subpopulations could safely use this insulin. More stringent criteria and clear safety profiles would be necessary to gain broader support for approval.

Although the FDA is not obligated to follow the committee's recommendations, it usually takes them into serious consideration. The future of insulin icodec will depend significantly on further research and more robust safety data.

Conclusion

The introduction of a weekly insulin product represents a significant potential advancement in diabetes care. However, the current concerns surrounding safety and the risk of hypoglycemia highlight the complexities involved in bringing such a product to market. Continued research and stringent safety measures will be crucial to ensure that any new treatment is both effective and safe for all patients.

Patient Perspectives

Patient representatives expressed mixed feelings. Some, like Paul Tibbits Jr., indicated support but emphasized the need for strict limitations to ensure patient safety.

For policymakers and healthcare providers, balancing innovation with patient safety is a delicate task but necessary for advancing diabetes management options.

References

  1. FDA Advisory Committee
    https://www.fda.gov
  2. Novo Nordisk
    https://www.novonordisk.com